What is the difference between adaptive and maladaptive anxiety

So, while the stuffed animal stopped your anxiety temporarily, it created more problems for you in the long run. Using the stuffed animal as a way to feel secure is an example of negative coping. Maladaptive coping can also cause you to go out of your way to avoid stressful situations and eventually you begin to isolate yourself from society.

You are too great to be isolated and filled with anxiety. When you react to a stressful situation in a mature and healthy manner, you are positively coping.

This means you are using your knowledge and internal strength to adjust to a negative situation and avoid an overreaction or other wrong reactions. Instead of flipping out, yelling, and screaming because someone cut you off in rush hour traffic, you turn the radio on and listen to music you know will make you smile.

Instead of quitting your job on the spot after your boss yells at you, you use a journal to jot down your thoughts and feelings. You redirect your negative thoughts, or stop them altogether, to create a more peaceful ending to the situation. Positive coping mechanisms are plentiful.

Below is a list of some of the more common positive coping techniques. Meditation or prayer can give you the time you need to self-reflect and refocus on what is important. Meditation is best used daily before crises arise. It teaches you self-control, making it easy to avoid reacting poorly to a negative situation.

Many of our problems relate to negative self-talk. Find a way to stop these negative thoughts. As soon as a negative thought crosses your mind, put a stop to it. Interfere with the thought with a command to yourself to stop thinking negatively. With practice, you will retrain your brain to get rid of any negative self-talk.

You can also practice the art of distraction. The idea behind distraction is that you can stop having negative thoughts about yourself if you find a way to get distracted. If you are at work and your invisible voice starts trying to tell you what a failure you are, find a distraction.

Leave your office, go for a drive or walk, or just get up and walk around your office. Do whatever you can to slowly retrain your brain to think positive thoughts.

One of the best ways to learn adaptive coping strategies and avoid negative ones is to meet with a professional counselor. However, in spite of the rugged shape of the plot, the basic trend in the upper right-hand panel of Fig.

A1 is that the fraction of the population that believes the environment is bad when it is actually good increases with p g. In the lower panel of Fig. And, the small fraction of parameter combinations where this is not the case all occur towards the edge of the parameter space on the left side in the plot. Again, for it to matter whether the environment is good or bad, our parameters must satisfy inequalities 1.

The upper left plot displays the fraction that thinks the environment is good when it is actually bad; the upper right plot displays the fraction that thinks the environment is bad when it is actually good.

The lower plot illustrates the log base 10 of the ratio of incorrect inference rates in good and bad environments. Here, incorrect inferences are more common in good environments for all parameter values. Figure A2 shows that, similar to the pattern in Fig. A1, the fraction of the population that is wrong when the environment is bad is negligible except when there are not enough time steps in which to make accurate discriminations in the lower part of the upper left panel of Fig.

By contrast, the fraction of the population that is wrong when the environment is good is nonnegligible throughout most of the parameter space upper right panel. Discontinuities due to optimal behavior being characterized by small integer values are especially striking here, especially in the upper right panel of Fig.

What is happening is that the number of failures it takes before it is optimal to cease to explore is the main outcome distinguishing different parameter choices. With p g and p b fixed, that number also determines the fraction of the population that will hit that number of failures.

And so, the plot is characterized by a small number of curved bands in which the fraction of the population that is wrong about the environment is nearly constant. Although the value is nearly constant within each band, we can still describe the trend across these bands. We see that the fraction of the population that believes that the environment is bad when it is actually good increases with increasing relative cost or decreasing discount factor.

Thus, analysing the model with cues will also provide an analysis of the simpler model. The problem can be framed as a Markov decision process, and can be analysed with a dynamic programming approach [ 33 ]. The fox knows the initial prior probability that the environment is bad, and at time step t will also know the outcome of any attempts made before t.

For each time step t and all possible previous experience, a behavioral rule specifies the threshold cue level u t such that the fox will not dig at the burrow if the observed cue intensity, x t , is greater than u t. The only relevant aspect of previous experience is how this experience changes the current conditional probability q t that the environment is bad.

Thus, we can express a behavioral rule as the set of functions u t q t. In the bad environment, the probability density of badgers and a cue strength of x t is f b , c x t p b. Likewise, f g , c x t p g gives the probability density of badgers and a cue strength of x t in the good environment.

This allows us to calculate the expected immediate payoff for the strategy of threshold u t as. We now describe how the Bayesian probability that the environment is bad, q t , changes with time t. In the bad environment, the probability density on cues x is given by. The fox will then observe both the cue and whether the burrow contains a badger or a rabbit.

The conditional probability that the burrow contains a badger given the cue x t and a bad environment is. Note that technically some of these quantities are probability densities rather than probabilities.

Similarly, if the environment is good, then P badger x t , good env. P badger good env. P x t good env. The dynamic programming algorithm now consists of recursively calculating the maximum payoff attainable over all time steps subsequent to t , as a function of the current probability that the environment is bad.

This maximum payoff is denoted V t q t , and the recursive formula is. Because q t is a continuous variable, a discrete approximation must be used for the actual computation. For q t , we used discrete values 0, 0.

Within this interval, we discretized x t to values. Because there is a tiny area lost at the ends of the distributions, we renormalized the total probabilities to 1. To find the optimal behavior in the limit as the possible lifetime extends towards infinity, the recursion is repeated until the optimal decision rules converge [ 33 ].

The algorithm was implemented in python. Once we have found the optimal decision rule, for each time step we can calculate the expected proportion of the population that has each value of q t as its estimate. National Center for Biotechnology Information , U. Evol Med Public Health.

Published online Aug Frazer Meacham and Carl T. Carl T. Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Corresponding author. E-mail: ude. Received Dec 31; Accepted Jun This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Normal anxiety is considered an adaptive response to the possible presence of danger, but is susceptible to dysregulation.

Keywords: anxiety disorders, learning, signal detection theory, mood disorders, dynamic programming. Model Because our aim is to reveal general principles around learned pessimism, rather than to model specific human pathologies, we frame our model as a simple fable. Open in a separate window. Figure 1. Population outcomes After solving for the optimal decision rule, we can examine statistically what happens to an entire population of optimally foraging foxes.

Figure 2. Comments This self-perpetuating pessimism is not a consequence of a poor heuristic for learning about the environment; we have shown that this phenomenon occurs when individuals are using the optimal learning strategy.

Model We return to our story of the fox, who we now suppose can listen at the entrance to the burrow before deciding whether to dig it up. Optimal behavior In this extended model, the good and bad environments can differ not only in the frequency of badgers, but also in how readily badgers can be distinguished from rabbits by sound alone. Figure 3. Population outcomes In this signal detection model, the fox has two ways to learn about its environment.

Figure 4. Supplementary Material Supplementary Data: Click here to view. Acknowledgements The authors thank Corina Logan, Randy Nesse and two anonymous referees for helpful suggestions and discussions.

Appendix 1. Figure A1. Figure A2. Bayesian updating We now describe how the Bayesian probability that the environment is bad, q t , changes with time t. P badger x t , bad env. P badger bad env. P badger x t , good env. P bad env. P x t , badger. Dynamic programming The dynamic programming algorithm now consists of recursively calculating the maximum payoff attainable over all time steps subsequent to t , as a function of the current probability that the environment is bad.

Conflict of interest : None declared. An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood. Fear and fitness: an evolutionary analysis of anxiety disorders. Ethol Sociobiol ; 15 — Nesse RM. The smoke detector principle. Ann N Y Acad Sci ; — Natural selection and the regulation of defenses: a signal detection analysis of the smoke detector principle.

Evol Hum Behav ; 26 — The psychology of potential threat: properties of the security motivation system. Biol Psychol ; 85 —7. Anxiety: an evolutionary approach. Can J Psychiatry ; 56 — Nettle D, Bateson M.. The evolutionary origins of mood and its disorders. Curr Biol ; 22 :R— Anxiety-induced cognitive bias in non-human animals.

Physiol Behav ; 98 — The protective role of trait anxiety: a longitudinal cohort study. Psychol Med ; 36 — Levels of anxiety and depression as predictors of mortality: the HUNT study. Br J Psychiatry ; — The global burden of mental disorders: an update from the who world mental health wmh surveys. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc ; 18 — Prevalence and incidence studies of anxiety disorders: a systematic review of the literature.

Can J Psychiatry ; 51 Global prevalence of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-regression. Psychol Med ; 43 — Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of month dsm-iv disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 62 — The economic burden of anxiety disorders in the s.

J Clin Psychiatry ; 60 — Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of dsm-iv disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Times Books, New York, The evolution of error: error management, cognitive constraints, and adaptive decision-making biases. Trends Ecol Evol ; 28 — Evolution, emotions, and emotional disorders. Am Psychol ; 64 McNamara J, Houston A.. The application of statistical decision theory to animal behaviour. J Theor Biol ; 85 — Adaptive learning can result in a failure to profit from good conditions: implications for understanding depression.

Evol Med Publ Health ; — Frankenhuis WE, Panchanathan K.. Balancing sampling and specialization: an adaptationist model of incremental development. Panchanathan K, Frankenhuis WE.. The evolution of sensitive periods in a model of incremental development. Reinforcement learning: a survey. J Artif Intell Res ; 4 — Bertsekas DP. The evolution of decision rules in complex environments.

Trends Cogn Sci ; 18 — An adaptive response to uncertainty generates positive and negative contrast effects. Science ; —6. Animal behaviour: cognitive bias and affective state. It could be a temporary reaction until we have a chance to think about it. Adaptive behavior is making the choice to solve a problem or minimize an unwanted outcome. For example, an avid reader who is losing their eyesight might adapt by learning Braille or buying audiobooks. They find a way to continue enjoying books.

Maladaptive behavior would be not acknowledging vision loss or the need for change. It feels out of control and painful to think about, so no action is taken. They end up missing out on something they enjoy. Avoiding a threat or disengaging from unpleasantness is often the best move, especially for temporary things over which you have no control.

Suppose you have social anxiety, but your job requires you to mix and mingle on a regular basis. Adaptive behaviors would be to seek help for social anxiety, try exposure therapy, or find a more suitable job. Consider the college student who uses video games to avoid joining clubs or meeting new people.

The games are a distraction and provide temporary relief from anxiety. In the long run, avoidance does nothing to improve coping skills. Invitations stop coming, anxiety builds, and the result is isolation. Passive-aggressiveness is when you express negative feelings indirectly rather than head-on. You say one thing but really mean another. Your true feelings are woven into your actions.

For example, your partner feels like staying home and cancels your dinner reservation. This may provide temporary relief, but only exacerbates problems and can potentially harm your health.

Anger is a normal emotion. Anger that spurs you to constructive action is useful. It alienates others and hampers your ability to communicate effectively.

Most children eventually see that there are better ways to get to the desired result. Any escape from reality is temporary at best. This behavior can lead to emotional and physical addiction , creating a whole new set of problems. Daydreaming is generally a healthy pastime. It frees the mind and helps you work out problems. Maladaptive daydreaming is when you engage in extensive fantasy in place of human interaction or participation in real life.

These daydreams can last hours at a time and involve intricate plots and characters that keep you going back. They can then keep you from facing reality. This can include:. There are many reasons you might form a maladaptive behavior pattern.