When was paul ordained

The act of laying hands on them v. In context it appears to be an informal group act of encouragement, support, and blessing. Is it possible, though, that the apostles did at some point ordain Paul to be an apostle, but that this event happens not to be reported in the New Testament? As I shall show in my next installment in this series, there is no realistic chance of this supposition being correct.

Grand Rapids: Baker, , Acts clearly distinguishes Paul from the Jerusalem apostles and elders Acts , 4, 6, , the body of leaders in the Jerusalem church. Likewise, all prophets were teachers but not all teachers were prophets 1 Cor. Tags: apostles , Mormonism , Paul. You must be logged in to post a comment. Find Entries. For example, Joseph Fielding Smith wrote: We are extremely lacking in information in relation to many important details that failed to seep through the ages to our day, and we are left in darkness to know when and where Paul was ordained.

Griggs offers two arguments in support of his conclusion: In his two letters to the Thessalonian saints, written from Corinth during the second journey, Paul does not refer to himself as an apostle in the introduction. This entry was posted on Sunday, November 16th, at pm and is filed under Mormonism , New Testament.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2. You can leave a response , or trackback from your own site. Leave a reply You must be logged in to post a comment. This site is produced by the Institute for Religious Research.

Venice, an. Arator was sent in quality of ambassador from Athalaric to the emperor Justinian. Following the practice of the apostles, the Church of God ordains a solemn and general fast on the four public times for ordination, the ember days, as a necessary preparation for so great a work, and this St. Leo calls also an apostolical tradition. See St. Leog, serm. Nor was this fasting a fasting from sin, as some ridiculously affirm, for such fasting was a universal obligation: nor was it left to each one's discretion, as certain heretics maintained.

And as they were ministering to the Lord and fasting, the Holy Ghost said to them: Separate me Saul and Barnabas, for the work whereunto I have taken them. And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away. What means, Ministering? Separate for Me, it says, Barnabas and Saul. What means, Separate for Me? For the work, for the Apostleship. The less the persons, the more palpable the grace. He is ordained henceforth to Apostleship, so as to preach with authority.

How then does he himself say, Not from men, nor by man? Galatians Because it was not man that called or brought him over: this is why he says, Not from men.

Neither by man, that is, that he was not sent by this man , but by the Spirit. Wherefore also the writer thus proceeds: So they, being sent forth by the Holy Ghost, departed unto Seleucia; and from thence they sailed to Cyprus. It is not impossible that Paul could have been ordained a priest in Acts and consecrated a bishop by St.

Peter in Galatians The ordination of bishops belongs to the Apostles and their successors. Teachers and Prophets can not ordain priests or consecrate bishops. The ordinary minister of the sacrament is the bishop, who alone has this power in virtue of his ordination.

Holy Scripture attributed the power to the Apostles and their successors Acts ; ; 1 Timothy ; 2 Timothy ; Titus , and the Fathers and councils ascribe the power to the bishop exclusively. I can find no historical proofs or traditions to back up the statement of an episcopal ordination here. There is nothing to indicate that any of the persons mentioned in in Acts were even considered bishops in this passage, at this precise moment in time.

Teachers and prophets are not bishops! Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? Do all speak in tongues? Do all interpret? But we know that Paul, after the scales came off of his eyes in the home of Ananais, and had recovered his strength, he preached in Damascus, so strongly that the Jews desired to kill him.

He was lowered in a basket to escape, and Barnabas took charge of him in Jerusalem-this was his first meeting with the apostles, but they were wary of him. After another plot to kill him was discovered, they sent him to his home town of Tarsus. Acts then shifts the scene to Peter, but what of Paul? The answer is in the book of Galatians. After three years he went up to Jerusalem to confer with Cephas, Peter, and stayed with him for 15 days, not seeing any of the other apostles.

Then he went to Syria and Cilicia, and was unknown to the churches of Judea. This is when Paul became an apostle. To recap, he was converted not his own word , went into the desert, then after three years went to Jerusalem, then after 14 years, he went back to confer with the apostles, at which time they laid hands on him, which is really when Paul becomes an apostle. This shows a couple of things…it shows clearly what Paul demonstrates in the letters to Timothy about what is required to be a bishop, a successor of the apostles.

It requires laying on of hands. Third, it shows how the Catholic Church is really the Church Jesus founded. Paul become an apostle? In Galatians St. Paul simply declares he is an apostle and he is thus sent from God and not men to preach the Gospel. In fact the full answer lies further down in Galatians 1, when St. In these days prophets came from Jerusalem to Antioch. These prophets ranked second to the apostles in the framework of God's Church. Their mission seems to have been to receive messages or prophecies direct from God, and to convey these messages from God to the apostles or evangelists or elders.

God's Word had not yet been completely committed to writing. The New Testament was still in process of being written. There is no evidence of the existence of any prophets in the Church since the New Testament was written. Then there was a great famine, foretold by the prophet Agabus. Barnabas and Saul were sent with relief provisions to drought-stricken Jerusalem Acts About this time Herod the king became violent against the Church.

He killed James brother of John , and put Peter in prison at Passover time. Peter was freed from prison by an angel Acts Verse 25, Barnabas still named first and Saul returned to Antioch with Mark. Up to this time, Saul had engaged only in a preparatory ministry -- had not yet entered his called mission to the Gentiles. He had been merely gaining preparatory experience. From "Cruden's Concordance," it is: "To appoint, or design to a certain end or use. He spoke boldly. He spoke convincingly.

But never with authority. Never did he issue orders. You read of Paul's ordination in verse 3, of Acts Notice, verse 6, they found a certain sorcerer, a false prophet, who opposed Barnabas and Saul. And now, behold, the hand of the Lord is upon you, and you shall be blind and unable to see the sun for a time. Never before had Paul assumed authority.

That government is the government of GOD. It operates from GOD, at the top, on down. Before Saul did any more than a little preparatory preaching, asserting that Jesus was the prophesied Messiah -- even before his ordination as an apostle -- he went to Jerusalem to see Peter -- to report to Peter his vision from Christ, and the commission Christ had given him. It is evident from the Scriptural account that Peter accepted him. During his 15 days with Peter in Jerusalem, he roomed with Peter Gal.

The Prophets with the teachers, who, under direct instruction from Christ, ordained Paul at Antioch, had come from Jerusalem. Nothing was at any time done contrary to, or in opposition to, Peter or the Apostles.

There was always perfect harmony and cooperation. Later, 14 years after his conversion Gal. God had revealed to him the command to go. He then communicated privately to Peter and the Apostles the Gospel he preached among the Gentiles. This was the same visit to Jerusalem recorded in Acts But still there was perfect harmony. There was no conflict. It is well, here, to explain the titles God uses for those in office in His government.

But what about such titles as "Elder," "Bishop," "Overseer", or "Presbyter. Actually, all these latter four mean exactly the same thing. A Bishop, or an Overseer, is an Elder -- and the Presbyters are, simply, elders.

Actually, Apostles are also elders, and the assistant pastors, or even non-preaching teachers and leaders in local churches are elders. In other words, ALL ministers of Christ, no matter how high or low the office of authority, are Elders. To understand the derivation of the term "Elder," let me briefly sketch for you the history of the title.

The original government of the Hebrews, from Abraham, was patriarchal. The head of the family exercised the supreme rule under God , over all his descendants. His married sons bore rule over their respective families, children and grandchildren, etc. At the father's death, his firstborn son succeeded him in supreme headship over the family.

Naturally, these positions, hence the designation, "Elder," which simply meant the oldest one. Thus Jacob Israel was the supreme head over all who went to Egypt with him, also his sons had families of their own.